Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
ATAS/569/2004 • CJ GE ATAS/569/2004 KI-generiert

Retroactive Statute Challenged on Due Process and Contract Grounds

Geschäftsnummer ATAS/569/2004
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Genf (CH-GE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A dispute arose concerning whether a statute requiring payment for services rendered prior to the law's enactment, even for continuing obligations, was an unconstitutional retroactive application violating due process or impairing contracts. The court reasoned that the statute served a legitimate public purpose by addressing an existing problem and that the retroactive application was not unduly harsh or oppressive given the nature of the continuing obligation and the public benefit achieved, thus upholding the statute against the constitutional challenges.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Retroactive Statute Challenged on Due Process and Contract Grounds: The court reasoned that the statute served a legitimate public purpose by addressing an existing problem and that the retroactive application was not unduly harsh or oppressive given the nature of the continuing obligation and the public benefit achieved, thus upholding the statute against the constitutional challenges.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Nichtschuld Kontrahierungspflicht öffentlich-rechtliche Leistung erbrachte Dienstleistungen Weiterausrichtung von Leistungen Rückwirkung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision was cited to regulate the costs of the proceedings concerning the appeal.
KI-generiert
A/2735/2006
Property Rights Challenge to Retroactive Statute
A/253/2005
Statute Retroactivity in Enforcement Actions
A/3612/2007
Tax Statute Retroactivity Challenge
A/1561/2003
Contract Interpretation and Retroactive Amendment Application
A/1406/2004
Statutory Assessment Retroactivity and Due Process Challenge

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision was cited to regulate the costs of the proceedings concerning the appeal.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

               "#$%"$&"'"( ")*+"'$$&

,,

- , .-( (  -,  (

'/  01    2%  '$$& 



3   -  -(  ( ! !)!* "#$%#&'(



#$*

45555555555 ,( !+,!*



            !

   20-2  

  !)!  )&+ 3#*$$ *  #)) ! ./ ,*  *$& ( ! ,*& !)&&$*$&,4

+*&$*!3*$&$3&5!#&*4

6!&!#)3*$&#3*#!3*$&!78&$0//14 6#*!&$*$*3*$&($$#&#9#!$&#3$$3#* #!!$#$#)3$#))!.,* :!+,!*3$!3'*   

  -./-0//1  2-2  

,   3 ( , .-( (  -,  (

 600   7

809   :  7   6! 2*' (;<

; #$( 9 <   <  !##*!( :)#$$!=#&$&)&$+(.,* 

0 6'#!)$$:!>#& 

 #$(?@@@@@@@@@@< !#AA)$(3'*$$#)) 

1 6'#!)$$:!>#& 

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

  -./-0//1