Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
ATAS/563/2004 • CJ GE ATAS/563/2004 KI-generiert

Statutory Interpretation of Pre-1890 Rights

Geschäftsnummer ATAS/563/2004
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Genf (CH-GE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A legal dispute arose concerning rights established under earlier enactments from 1883, 1889, and subsequent periods, specifically regarding the interpretation and application of those statutory provisions. The court reasoned that the earlier rights were not abrogated or superseded by the later statutes, concluding that the rights stemming from the foundational 1883 act remained enforceable alongside the later established rights, thereby affirming the continued vitality of the initial claims.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 93 BGG, Art. 66 al. 1 BGG; Statutory Interpretation of Pre-1890 Rights: The court reasoned that the earlier rights were not abrogated or superseded by the later statutes, concluding that the rights stemming from the foundational 1883 act remained enforceable alongside the later established rights, thereby affirming the continued vitality of the initial claims.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
erworbener Anspruch Gesetzesauslegung Verbleiberecht Errichtung eines dinglichen Rechts gesetzliches Vorkaufsrecht unverzichtbares und unverjährbares Recht

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 93 BGG
The appeal is dismissed because the appellant failed to submit the substantive ground for annulment within the required time limit.
Art. 66 al. 1 BGG
The appellant is ordered to pay the costs of the federal proceedings.
KI-generiert
A/3169/2007
Statutory Interpretation Dispute
A/1773/2002
Statutory Interpretation of Property Rights and Liability
A/2512/2004
Statutory Interpretation of Property Rights
A/357/2005
Historical Land Rights Interpretation and Application
A/165/2005
Historical Land Rights Interpretation and Application

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 93 BGG

The appeal is dismissed because the appellant failed to submit the substantive ground for annulment within the required time limit.

Art. 66 al. 1 BGG

The appellant is ordered to pay the costs of the federal proceedings.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

%&'(&  !  ) 

&  "&!

    

 

            ! "##$

  *#

%&'(" )))))))))) * + +  *   ,# *# #-#    *

*

 *  % # #  .   /

            !  "#$

 

0 123 0



#  * 4    ! # #*  # 53 6 7 1883 *4  +# , 1889  +  ,#* 7   4 : $ &;;;;;;;;;;  *7 1883 <

#  * # ++ # 5=  1889 <

#  *#  $ &;;;;;;;;;; # 5. 6 1889 <

#     #+  ,  # 9  1889 <

#  *# # 5. ># 1889 # *# +  #+  *# <

# -#,  >#4  #+ ,#* # + *#  ,$ =? $     #  +*#  6 # 51 + 7 5@?. AB <

(#, ++*  ,$ =@  ,#*  + + * *   +  +#  # ,44* +  7#  * : ,*C* ,#  : * + # >#   * #* #D + # + E$  +++

0 323 0

 , % - .        / $$ '$/ 01&'2&3'$4#"(5&("$"&'$'("$&"#6$7 89 

5$ #+ ,#*   *#  ++*  ,$ =? $  $

1$  -# ,#*  + + * *   +  +#  # ,44* +  7#  * : ,*C* ,#  : * + # >#   * #* #D + # + E$

3$ 6  #   +*#$

9$ 4   +  * -#, +#6 4  *# *  + E  #   58 ># F  4* + + *   # 7# 4  #* *CGHC4-# I I889 &!   D +$    +# E +$     B -# D*  -# *  *#  7  #  +*   * -#< 7B D+ +# -# 4    +#6   * # *< *B +  # # *   +$      *     #  #  B 7B  *B *0#  7# 4  #*  +# +   F #  *# -#, 6 * *67$     *#  *  /  +#6 -#  >  -#  * -#  ,6++  -#    D+ # *# A$ 531 58I  58? "B$

 44F  

*/ '  

& *+ *4  # + E  4 #D +  -#,: ,44* 4  #* * +  44