Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
ATAS/555/2013 • CJ GE ATAS/555/2013 KI-generiert

Beneficiary Withdraws Appeal Against Supplementary Benefits Service Decision

Geschäftsnummer ATAS/555/2013
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Genf (CH-GE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The court case involved an appeal filed by a beneficiary against a decision from the Supplementary Benefits Service (SPC) dated February 12, 2013, which had rejected her opposition to a prior SPC decision of October 25, 2012, as inadmissible due to being untimely. Following a hearing where the beneficiary appeared in person, she formally withdrew her appeal, leading the Social Insurance Chamber to acknowledge the withdrawal and strike the case from the court roll.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 68 al. 1 let. a LTF, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Beneficiary Withdraws Appeal Against Supplementary Benefits Service Decision: Following a hearing where the beneficiary appeared in person, she formally withdrew her appeal, leading the Social Insurance Chamber to acknowledge the withdrawal and strike the case from the court roll.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Entzug von Sozialversicherungsleistungen Ergänzungsleistung Rückzug des Rechtsvorschlags Wiederaufleben des Anspruchs sozialversicherungsrechtliches Klageverfahren IV-Bezüger

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 68 al. 1 let. a LTF
This article is cited implicitly as the basis for taking note of the withdrawal of the appeal, leading to the conclusion of the case.
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision governs the allocation of costs, which is implicitly considered when the case is struck from the roll following withdrawal.
KI-generiert
A/3868/2019
Insured Person Withdraws Appeal Against Supplementary Benefits Service Decision
A/1639/2012
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Supplementary Benefits Service Decision
A/3779/2024
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Supplementary Benefits Service Decision
A/2182/2017
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Supplementary Benefits Decision
A/1905/2012
Applicant's Withdrawal of Appeal Against Supplementary Benefits Service Decision

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 68 al. 1 let. a LTF

This article is cited implicitly as the basis for taking note of the withdrawal of the appeal, leading to the conclusion of the case.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision governs the allocation of costs, which is implicitly considered when the case is struck from the roll following withdrawal.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

A/666/2013

### [ATAS/555/2013](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1968525) du 30.05.2013 ( PC ) , RETIRE

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2013/0005/ATAS_000555_2013_A_666_2013.pdf)

RÉPUBLIQUE ET CANTON DE GENÈVE POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE A/666/2013 ATAS/555/2013 COUR DE JUSTICE Chambre des assurances sociales

Arrêt du 30 mai 2013 3ème Chambre

En la cause

Madame Y__________, domiciliée au PETIT-LANCY · recourante contre

SERVICE DES PRESTATIONS COMPLEMENTAIRES, DSE-SPC, sis route de Chêne 54, GENEVE · intimé

Vu la décision du SERVICE DES PRESTATIONS COMPLEMENTAIRES (SPC) du 12 février 2013 déclarant l'opposition formée par Madame Y__________ (ci-après : la bénéficiaire) contre sa décision du 25 octobre 2012 irrecevable pour cause de tardiveté;

Vu le recours interjeté par la bénéficiaire le 22 février 2013;

Vu la réponse de l'intimé du 12 mars 2013;

Vu le complément au recours du 19 mars 2013;

Vu les écritures de l'intimé des 10 et 16 avril 2013;

Vu l'audience de comparution personnelle des parties de ce jour;

Attendu qu'à l'issue de cette audience, la bénéficiaire des prestations a retiré son recours;

Qu'il convient d'en prendre acte et de rayer la cause du rôle.

PAR CES MOTIFS, LA CHAMBRE DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES :

1. Prend acte du retrait du recours.![endif]>![if>

2. Raye la cause du rôle.![endif]>![if>

La greffière Marie-Catherine SECHAUD · La Présidente : Karine STECK

Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties par le greffe le