Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
ATAS/530/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/530/2007 KI-generiert

Business Inventory Tax Valuation Appeals

Geschäftsnummer ATAS/530/2007
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Genf (CH-GE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The court reviewed several appeals concerning the assessment of business inventory and tangible personal property taxes, primarily challenging the valuation methods used by the taxing authority, including comparisons to past assessments and the application of depreciation schedules. The court reasoned that the taxing authority's methodology, which employed sales ratio studies reflecting market value and adjustments for known assessment errors, provided a constitutionally permissible basis for valuation, finding that challenges to the exact percentages derived from complex statistical analyses did not demonstrate the systematic and intentional undervaluation necessary to invalidate the assessments, and thus upheld the tax valuations.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Business Inventory Tax Valuation Appeals: The court reasoned that the taxing authority's methodology, which employed sales ratio studies reflecting market value and adjustments for known assessment errors, provided a constitutionally permissible basis for valuation, finding that challenges to the exact percentages derived from complex statistical analyses did not demonstrate the systematic and intentional undervaluation necessary to invalidate the assessments, and thus upheld the tax valuations.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Steuerinventar Katasterschätzung Wert der Umsätze Besteuerungsgrundlage Abschreibung Mobiliarvermögen

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision was cited in order 9 to regulate the costs of the proceedings.
KI-generiert
A/414/2004
Taxpayer Challenge to Business Asset Valuation Methodology Upheld
A/1825/2007
Property Tax Assessment and Valuation Appeals
A/1397/2004
Tax Assessment Valuation Method Challenge
A/2367/2007
Property Tax Valuation Method Dispute
A/2071/2006
Tax Assessment and Commercial Property Valuation Disputes

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision was cited in order 9 to regulate the costs of the proceedings.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

           #$%&#'(() *#%+(#'(()

*

 * *     

,-. &  /$ - '(() 



   !   "#$%& $ !%   '!%(%$  )* + ,$ % 

 $   !$-.

%$

*/0$- %-  12)3$ , !4$

0      * )3$ ,

          !   "

  857  

 0*

:; $<=%><& $8229?@,A$ $ A#$ @$ % #$!   %   $ = %$%!  9 #%A$ :>>: B + =% C5.- D #$   ! *  :>62 %  $!:>68;

8; *  , 44$ :2   # % 4  <=% #$! %!  $ A  #$ @$ %! %E$$ ==%#$%=$#$ % ! %$E#$%% $% % $!#$!&.#$4 ! #$$#%$!$ =;

?;  <=%   &$ % & !4  % 4  :7 4!&$ $ 8229 %  !%! %$  '44  $ A!884!&$ $8229#$E!% #$%=;

1;  $ A! %$#! % %% !4$#$ %   F$  %%  & $  F  #$  $ $%  $ = %%$9#%A$:>>:%:74!&$ $8229;

7; $$$ $G$8229*/0  F!F$!% %44  ! #$@   0     "   *  * $ *  * @&# :  :>>>%F#$%%  A$ #=H!& %B?G2'1?G4$;B% &$;#$! !& $$I88 <  :>>>  %%  67'2G: 4$; 87 C% J :7'>G: 4$; G7D   ) +    H   *    1'G2? 4$; C% J 2 4$;D  :2 <& $ 8222   0     "    0   * K*%:'?814$;C%J24$;D:1< %8222 %%L4% ;

6; $ $$ $  82 $ 8229 ) +    H  *  $ 4 $!F$!%!44  !: %A$:>>7?2&$ :>>>%F  #$%%   $%   67'2G: 4$; 87  !%! %$4!$!  :G <  :>>> B    *  5*/0;

9; 89$8229K*   F!F$%$& !#$@  !%!:$%A$:>>7?2&$ :>>>;$%44  % #$@  % %% #$!&.#$%%  A$#=H!%!&$!;  $% %%67'2G:4$;871'G2?4$;%:'?814$;%!%!%$4!$!B   *  B)$ ,;

G; :G&$ 8229$ 4$! $ AFH%$:>>:%:>>? & % %$& ! B $  % & % % ! #$@   &$ % %%   #$!&. 4$I  FH # %F%%& %!%! !#$E-!#$FH 

    567158229 ?57  

F %%!# ;:>>1B#%A$:>>7$FH !B%$& $ #$KB@& %  %#;

>;  $   F!  $ A  $!   #%   A$#=&$%#$@  *;

:2; %%!%!%$ E#$% %?2&$ 8229;<$  %  $  F!F 4$% $  #$%%  A$#=  $ H!@& B ?G2'1?G 4$; %   % ! $& % B HE-!# % F'B !4%'A$&% '  > 8229$$L%$ %$$%%A;

::; 'A'A<% ! 4 E!!%!=$!B<=$;

 *

:; '$%;87 4!!$$ A$#=#$!&.#$4  &  $& &%% &  %!:9!A$:>>?C0D%$!& =$ :$<& $8222$@=#$!$ &$;$F< %% #H$$#$%% $% B#$%=$C$%;:88%:8?  & - D <=  &$#!%%'$%;9?;: 4!!$$ #$!&. #$4   87 <  :>G8 CD  % B @&  $ A %$ # :$M%822? %#$@F'44 $   !%!%$ C$%;:18 DE!%$'44 #$%=$A ! $!#$% % !%$ !#$<= &$;

8; *'$%;880C&%$& =$# :$<& $8222D   &$  #$%%   $%  F  $%  $ = % #$%=! 4$!% E$%;:88:8?:1:%:18 N$%;?B7 0'## F% #$= %%B%$4!$$C;:D;$,F< %#$%%  $% B#$%=$$$#B 44!$%$#$%% $% =%!  & $   A$ #= E %% !&%%  %   &$ %  #$%% $% =%!& $ A$#=E %%!&%% % $ =C4;$%;810D;$<% B  #$%%   $%  % B '& $   A$ #= E %%  %      $ =  %!$L%   %   &$ C 0 :8G  8?2N 0:8>111D;

 H#@  <=  #$ @$ %  ! % E $  $ ==%  #$%=$ #$  % !  #$%%   $%  F  $%  $ =#$$ %9#%A$:>>::74!&$ $8229;

    567158229 157  

*  % #$ %  #$%%  F  #%  $ = #$  $H!@&B?G2'1?G4$; %!$L%.%!<B!%!!#$H % %%  #$!&.!4$;!F$ %BE-!# %%:>2'8:>4$;

?; 4$!% B  <$ #$ #   <$ !%$ % #$  #$%= <F'%%$4$%#$%% $% $< %  &$!A!!4   $%%#$%% $ %B %!$L%#% $$ %%- ;  %!$L%%!%E  !='$%;:8 '$$#$!&.#$4 &  $& &%% &  %!  :G &$  :>G1 C 8D    %E $!=% $    -  % #!$ $ C 0#A !?6528:G< %822?D;

1;  !%  $ #$I  #$!$ !%% =$% % C$%; 9? ; 8  % G>+;: $#$!$  %$% &:8#%A$:>G7D;



OOO



    567158229 757  

  1*0  * *     

:; & % */ 0  B %$4!$$  #%   $     :>2H8:> 4$; B  0           * #% ; >122767->G-:2  4&$    *  F %!$L%#% $ !$%@ :74!&$ $8229<F'%%$4$%;

8; H.%%FA ;

?;  %F#$!$%=$% %;

1; 4$  #$%    FH #&% 4$$ $$ %$  #$!% $$L%   !   ?2 <$ @  % 4 %  #$@  $ A 4!!$ C*,P Q$,4F 66221  D#$& $$% @$$ % #A 4$!%E$%;G8 4!!$$ $ A4!!$:9 <  8227 C 0DN  ! $  $$  %  F$    % 4 % .#$&%#$%$ =%$$$%% $N  % L%$ $!  $ A 4!!$ #$ &  #%  #$ &  !%$ F E  %   '$%; 18  0;  #$!% $$L% %  # @  #   $$% &F!.#$& &%L%$< %B'& ;  =$44 @$  $! %J         *.&  + K    

# 4$#$!%$$L%%% 4 !E#$%   FHBH44 4!!$ $ #$=$44

    567158229