Withdrawal of Appeal in Supplementary Benefits Case
Schweiz · Kanton Genf (CH-GE)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe appellant filed an appeal against a decision by the supplementary benefits office concerning a matter of supplementary benefits, but during the in-person hearing, the appellant formally withdrew the appeal. The court, citing the relevant procedural law which stipulates that the withdrawal of an appeal terminates the proceedings, took note of the withdrawal, struck the case from the roll, and ruled that no fees would be charged for the procedure.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 100 al. 1 LTF, Art. 64 LTF; Withdrawal of Appeal in Supplementary Benefits Case: The court, citing the relevant procedural law which stipulates that the withdrawal of an appeal terminates the proceedings, took note of the withdrawal, struck the case from the roll, and ruled that no fees would be charged for the procedure.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertThis provision dictates that the withdrawal of the appeal terminates the procedure, which is the basis for the court's decision to acknowledge the withdrawal and strike the case from the roll.
Although not explicitly cited in the dispositive, the withdrawal of the appeal implies that the decision on costs is procedural and typically governed by procedural laws. Given that the procedure is declared free of charge, this provision relating to costs in case of withdrawal is implicitly applied, but since the decision states explicitly that 'no fee is charged' and does not cite a specific procedural cost article like Art. 66 LTF, we rely only on the cited articles. However, since the text cites Art. 89 LPA for the procedure, and the costs section only states 'The procedure is free of charge' followed by order 3, we only list the explicitly cited articles.
This provision governs legal aid. Since the procedure is declared free of charge (no fee is charged), and no specific article for cost imposition (like Art. 66 LTF) is cited, Art. 64 LTF is not directly applicable as legal aid was not requested or granted, only the absence of fees was noted. Therefore, only Art. 89 LPA is extracted as the decisive provision.
Volltext
A/928/2018
### [ATAS/468/2018](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1974360) du 04.06.2018 ( PC ) , RETIRE
[](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2018/0004/ATAS_000468_2018_A_928_2018.pdf)
rÉpublique et · canton de genÈve
POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE
A/928/2018 ATAS/468/2018 COUR DE JUSTICE Chambre des assurances sociales
Arrêt du 4 juin 2018 6ème Chambre
En la cause
Monsieur A______, domicilié à GENEVE · recourant
contre
SERVICE DES PRESTATIONS COMPLÉMENTAIRES, sis DEAS, Route de Chêne 54 ; case postale 6375, GENEVE · intimé
Vu en fait la décision sur opposition du 2 mars 2018 du Service des prestations complémentaires (ci-après : SPC) ;
Vu le recours du 16 mars 2018 de Monsieur A______ (ci-après : le recourant), interjeté contre ladite décision auprès de la chambre des assurances sociales de la Cour de justice ;
Vu la réponse du 12 avril 2018 du SPC ;
Vu la réplique du 30 mai 2018 du recourant ;
Vu l’audience de comparution personnelle des parties du 28 mai 2018 durant laquelle le recourant a déclaré retirer son recours ;
Attendu en droit que selon l'art. 89 al. 1 de la loi sur la procédure administrative, du 12 septembre 1985 (LPA ; RS E 5 10), le retrait du recours met fin à la procédure ;
Qu'en l'espèce le recours ayant été retiré, il convient d'en prendre acte et de rayer la cause du rôle.
Qu’au surplus, la procédure est gratuite.
PAR CES MOTIFS,
LA CHAMBRE DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES :
Statuant
Au fond :
1. Prend acte du retrait du recours ;![endif]>![if>
2. Raye la cause du rôle ;![endif]>![if>
3. Dit qu'aucun émolument n'est perçu.![endif]>![if>
La greffière Julia BARRY · La présidente Valérie MONTANI
Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties par le greffe le