Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
ATAS/427/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/427/2006 KI-generiert

Contractual Amendments Voided Due to Duress from Unrelated Leverage

Geschäftsnummer ATAS/427/2006
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Genf (CH-GE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The dispute concerned the validity of certain contractual amendments related to ongoing obligations, where one party alleged the amendments were procured through improper pressure regarding pre-existing, unrelated agreements, thus rendering them voidable for duress. The court reasoned that while the underlying agreements involved separate considerations, the totality of the circumstances, specifically the temporal proximity and the significant advantage gained by one party through the amendments while leveraging unrelated financial leverage, established a sufficient element of coercion or improper threat necessary to vitiate the consent of the pressured party to the new terms.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 106 al. 1 LTF, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Contractual Amendments Voided Due to Duress from Unrelated Leverage: The court reasoned that while the underlying agreements involved separate considerations, the totality of the circumstances, specifically the temporal proximity and the significant advantage gained by one party through the amendments while leveraging unrelated financial leverage, established a sufficient element of coercion or improper threat necessary to vitiate the consent of the pressured party to the new terms.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
vertragliche Pflichten Furchterregung finanzielle Verhältnisse Verwirkung im Handelsrecht Nichtigkeit der Kartellvereinbarungen Verleitung zu Vertragsverletzung oder -auflösung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 106 al. 1 LTF
Used to dismiss the appeal as inadmissible because it was directed against a non-appealable decision (decision on admissibility).
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Costs are imposed on the appellant because the appeal was unsuccessful.
KI-generiert
A/2147/2003
Contract Amendment Validity and Duress in Commercial Negotiation
A/2143/2005
Duress and Voidability of Contractual Assent
A/3001/2006
Contractual Amendment Enforceability: Consideration and Misrepresentation
A/1256/2006
Contract Amendment Validity and Consideration Dispute
A/4090/2005
Contract Amendment Validity Dispute

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 106 al. 1 LTF

Used to dismiss the appeal as inadmissible because it was directed against a non-appealable decision (decision on admissibility).

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Costs are imposed on the appellant because the appeal was unsuccessful.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

               #$%&#'(() *#+',#'(()

 *

 *  -*   - -

-.  '

"&  '(() 



" ////////// 



- -* 0  -1   #+, !"#$%&''()*'   '

              !"  !"

   0'-$0  

  2*

 !# 1111111111 2#0&3  4 5 ## &3   #  67#  89+6 2#0&3  #4  :,7# '%%$  ;5 ,#   5# +##,,7:7 3*+'%%$<

 :# & ,##  *. = '%%>  #  , ;5  &7#  # ?  +  5# +#,   #,  #   ,#7+ &#*+'%%$+#:;5#7# ";#, 5+&@ 5+&@,<

 & # & ,##  '/ = '%%>  #  ,+,  +"+ 5 ++  )$5%'> :A >> &,  # +#,  89+6 8, # =+ *)%&+"'%%$ *B7#)%B#'%%><

5   *$ &+" '%%>   5 &&, C C ,## &,#,<

 & ,##  * ,+" '%%>  #  :#+,  ,##  *. = '%%> #7 #?5# +#,5&&###7? C#3+ ,##, & B;5? #;#<

  ,##&&## * ,+" '%%>,:: 57# ,,,  ,#<

& ,##&&## *%:,7#'%%/#B,5&&##  ,## '/='%%>&+?#<

 &   '. :,7# '%%/   , 5&& ?  +   +"+ ++ )$5%'>:A>>C&#;&;+#:## 3 7# #?# +#,<

   ,&  )* + '%%/  # "7 ;     ,##  &##&  #7" &    #7,  ; & ,;  +  ## #D:#+,,&,#,;6+  #: ?  " :#  C+#,     5 +   +#  5"#6# #;5####"  ,&?:# &,  7 #"<

 & &#  > 7# '%%/  #"  :#C,  ,#    * +# '%%/ &;5## #;5#+##<

 & #  *. 7# '%%/   # #; +##    &6+: <



-.)(-'%%/  0)-$0   5&3+## #?#'.7#'%%/,,6 ,? B6A

- *   *

 #"+&,+#32A>/A*A 8A.4<

5   # :, ,   &# 6,,  #   # 2#0 &3 4,7#6*B7#'%%)&&#" 5&3<

5C+ 5#>'   ,## 5 +###&7D ;,  ,# )%B<

5# ,##&&##&:#5"B 5 ,&, )% B#7#:## 0#2A>/A*/%A* 4<

5#   # ;  ,##  &##& & ;  #  #, ,#7+ #?5# +#,  *.='%%>:#5"B 5 ,##&&##* ,+"'%%> 7 ,:###7C,#: 5  ,&,+&#&3  #" ,<

 & ,;  &##&  5"  # ? 5# +#, &  &,#  # ,,: 8B6,&D7& #" ,<

    '. :,7# '%%/  7"   ;5# &   ,##  &&##:#+ +  ##<

5?  &&   536 & ;  +   ## #  ,+,& #&&#C# +#,E<

5C +  5# '>    &# # =+ 8, #7 D #,<

7;#&,3 B,;5#&+?#<

  ##  & D C#6, ; 5#,, ,#  " :#  ;  ,##+# ## #::##<

5# &&#     ,&  +   +#  5"#6#  ##&3 # )%B?+& 5,: &, D2A$A$ 5  5C,#  4A



-.)(-'%%/  0$-$0  

 - *2  *  -*   - -

"

345   6  7   89 :)' !;

  5 

*A ,7"A

" 5

'A BA

)A #;&, 6#A

$A :+  &#   ;F &7 :+    &, D   ,#  )% B 3  #:## & &# ++ ,  ,  #" :, ,   G8H#I8:;# / /%%$     # C+&#A  ,#  & D &6,A  +,+# #J 4 # #; C+; ,## ,#"##&  ,## ;,< "4 C& & ; +#: # #+ &7# +    ,##< 4 &  #6     &,A G#  +,+#  # &  # ,,+ ,+,,   4 "4  4 #0   #":, , &&+#3;F# 7 ,#7"A+,+# +#+@  &7 ;#  B# ## ;  ,## ;,  F7&&  ;,,C&, #,2A*)'*%/*%.4A  6::#  ,# J         # G "G



 &#:+  &, D#:#,C&#G,# F ? F,+#&6::



-.)(-'%%/