Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
ATAS/405/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/405/2006 KI-generiert

Sale vs. Loan Characterization of Repurchase Agreements

Geschäftsnummer ATAS/405/2006
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Genf (CH-GE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case concerns a dispute over whether certain transactions constituted a sale or a loan, focusing on whether there was an immediate right to repurchase the property at a fixed price. The court determined that the primary indicator was the intent of the parties and the absence of an unconditional obligation to repay, concluding that the transactions were genuine sales where the seller retained an option to repurchase, rather than disguised loans, because the relevant agreements fixed the repurchase price irrespective of the initial consideration paid, thus distinguishing them from security interests intended to function as mortgages.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Sale vs. Loan Characterization of Repurchase Agreements: The court determined that the primary indicator was the intent of the parties and the absence of an unconditional obligation to repay, concluding that the transactions were genuine sales where the seller retained an option to repurchase, rather than disguised loans, because the relevant agreements fixed the repurchase price irrespective of the initial consideration paid, thus distinguishing them from security interests intended to function as mortgages.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Pensionsgeschäft Darlehensvertrag Wertpapierumsätze Grundstückkauf Kreditverkauf fester Preis

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
KI-generiert

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This article was cited in the dispositive to rule on the costs of the proceedings.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

     

   

#$%&#'((& #%()#'((&

 * 

+ "+ *  +* *

*, - .

! '  '((&

  

 !!!!!!!!!!" #$%    " &%'% & '

((( ( ( ' $&' ) %' # #$  * '# # +' # 

'

((      (  ,  "   '$% # '-' ./"  &' 0012" 3033    0

         ! "  !

7 042 7

!  / 0!  !!!!!!!!!!  #%&%  0/ #%$- 0//8  #$# #*#$'%   #*)-'% &9 #  ((      (  ,  :7&9  ;<

 & #% # 00 #%$- 0//8" 7 * =$% >* ?''  #$#  $'= >   @' # $$  %'' #' ) @' ') A #B #  C!!!!!!!!!!

  0D ?) 0//6" *'%%" &%'% & ((( ( ( "  =$% &&' A #' #%<

 & #%  &&' # 6 =%) 0//6"    =$%  #%<

 *'%%  '?'%   D $ 0//6<

    =$%  - # %"  . ) 0//6" >* # )' %'%  '  '' #  C!!!!!!!!!!' *'%%" &'' '$$'   9@$' #  % # < > #9 "  #  &)' #%$ & = )  #'  )$' #*#$'% #*)-'%<

 &  # 03 ) 0//6" *'%%  #%% '  <

*   0!   @)  E@' ?# :;  %'% $#=% '  ''%" #9  3 F' 0//2"  - ' #  " $&% # 8 ?@" #'  &%#' '  )7&%#'" 8 &&%' ' 36 ?@  :'G 3 'G  ' 86 ; <

 ' A E' # E%' # 36 ?@ " &  - =%#%  0D ?) 0//. : H 32/  3/6;"  #  @)  #&'%"  32 =%)"  #&' '' @' &$'''  - ' #   # %@   A ' ?@ ''" " # E''' # E%' # )B ?@  <

=$%$' A *'G 86  G 3 'G  IG 5 "  - ' #   +'  ' > # ''' &%) A E'G 86 #   =%#%   &' @%% # #' #   # 6 '- 0/// '%  )@  3 ?) 0//2 : ;" > ' ') A   =%#%  E7IJ$@ -@' ' E#$'%   #E)-'% # 08 ? 3150 : ;<

  $&%' & ?@ #  #E&9 '  %'- <

45.640//6

7 242 7

    %'% '% <

E )' #E &# ' ' # K   # J <

 * 1  "+ *  +* *

!

23/   4  5   67 .&'  8

  / 

3G %   )-G

! /

3G # ' # '' # G

0G K   # JG

2G ' >  &%# ' @''G

 @==9  %#' M

7  L    

 & =$ # &%' N' ' '=% B &'

45.640//6