Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
ATAS/372/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/372/2007 KI-generiert

Tax Assessment of Intangible Assets (Goodwill) Valuation Dispute

Geschäftsnummer ATAS/372/2007
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Genf (CH-GE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The appellant challenged a judgment upholding a tax assessment, arguing that the taxing authority miscalculated the value of intangible assets, specifically goodwill, when valuing the business for property tax purposes, contending that the required use of a specific valuation method yielded an arbitrary and excessive result. The court reasoned that the taxing authority's method, which relied on capitalization of earnings to derive the intangible value, was a permissible, standard approach under the relevant statutes, and that the appellant failed to demonstrate that the resulting assessment was so excessive as to be illegal or that the methodology was applied arbitrarily or based on clear error, thus affirming the lower court's decision to uphold the assessment.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Tax Assessment of Intangible Assets (Goodwill) Valuation Dispute: The court reasoned that the taxing authority's method, which relied on capitalization of earnings to derive the intangible value, was a permissible, standard approach under the relevant statutes, and that the appellant failed to demonstrate that the resulting assessment was so excessive as to be illegal or that the methodology was applied arbitrarily or based on clear error, thus affirming the lower court's decision to uphold the assessment.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Bewertung des Geschäftsvermögens Steuerveranlagungen Immaterialgut Goodwill Streitwert Liegenschaftssteuer

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Costs are imposed on the appellants as they lost the appeal.
KI-generiert
A/1524/2001
Tax Valuation Dispute Over Asset Value
A/4319/2006
Tax Assessment Valuation Dispute and Procedural Remedies
A/3076/2006
Tax Assessment Challenge Affirmed Against Petitioner
A/414/2004
Taxpayer Challenge to Business Asset Valuation Methodology Upheld
A/3712/2006
Tax Assessment Upheld on Related-Party Asset Sale Below Market Value

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Costs are imposed on the appellants as they lost the appeal.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

           &'()&*++, &-.*&*++.



#  /#   #  

01  2 % - 3  *++.        !" # !    ! !" $ %& !'()"(  !*"(  +(         (   &&, &  "7  * &     &-  & *  &      .  / 0) &(%123   4  $  - ()  !56 &  

              ! "# $% % 

  58:  

 4 

<= >1!( 5;>)566;9?!@!0  0 '!?( .%'? /'" )  !" <9:6("<9A9!" ( 59><9B2=

5= &@77A  '(7 >1!('"("  "(C'( D*"(( * )'(1'!(" ) '")E '7D'@ "'C (!1=

2=  '"  ) ( ) "7(7  9 ! 566; (  >1!(  0 '!?("("(!<;!566; 0 " 'D%'?  !((F(7"=

A=  0 "(" '(! ((( '")E '('"((( "7 '( !!D !(( )D (!1((59><9B2( 9!566;=

A= *((!"' 0 "'! *"(07()(G

&    55 ! 566;   &&  ,   &   * &        & -  &  *  &          .  / ((( F D ! (77" '<>)<99A!(( ) !"'( <22*B237=A:("H(9!566;!'=

"( *C(( !'( )  (( &% (!' ( !'(D ! ()""'(!(  *(( '0D ' <9B2=  * ' ( ' "(" ! F (())77(""=

& !   0  "     '   <: )!0 566; '"")()"( *77(("( <>)<9B: 2< I( <9B: ( ) !0"  <B (0 <9B: F  !   '(( ( 9;27=9:!'( @?D'(=

 !  D( F   "(" 77" '?  ' 7 ( (  $ & $  J% . ) ==  .&&&/& D(7"")F-    &&  *&& D%!H!(7""C%'?  && & &     & & &&  #&=56>( 566;&4&&- "")K'(( 0'1   ' '"(" ( * "1!( (7"" '?  4  $

    89:38566; 28:  

   < >) 566; "(( '"" D *(' , &  .&&&/  )( 7"  '  @1   1(   '")E '7=

& <9>566;4  $  7!"D )  ! "(( 3A5*B;97=;:(( L<83<;658 ( <6*55:7<:' 0'1 L523A:6("H(9!566; !'=

B=  !(("("(!C'(> ( D"D*F "7( *0)( *5)566BH(( ((0=

:= *0 *0>(  "7C""("1 "F>1=



  

<= *(=5: 7" "0'1 '")E'7 )))(() (" <B "!0<992.-/(")1 <>)5666?1'"   )=D>(( ' M '(( (F'(1.(=<55(<52   )% / >1   )!'"(( *(=B2=< 7" " '")E '7  5: > <935 ./ ( F ?)  0 (  '<I(5662 ('?D*77  "("(!.(=<A5 /C"( *77'(10  "  "'(( "(!"'>1  )=

5= &*(=55-.)()1 '<>)5666/  )  '((  ( D (  !1 ( '(1" 7!"!( C(=<55<52<A<(<A5 N(=2F: -*''D( '1!((F(7".=</=@D>('((  (F'(1' F 77"('(( (1!("  )  0 '1 C(( ")(!(  !!(  ) (  '(( (1!(" ) 0'1C((")(!( !!(  !1.7=(=5A-/=>( F  '((  ( ( F *)  0 '1 C((  !!(     !1  ("H(   !!(  ) . - <53  526N -<59AAA/=

2=  M'?  >1  '!? (  " ( C '(   D* "(( * )'(1'!(" ) '")E'7 D ' @  "'C (  !1=  ( '(( ( M

    89:38566; A8:  

'( !159><9B2 M('(9!566; (FD >1!(  )( )C"(=

A= &  !( ' (  '(( D '  !  (  3:5*99A7=36.3A5*B;97=;:O<6*55:7=<:/= D' !  (  <22*B23 7= A:=  ("H( ( ">F "(" " '  (((  '")E "7 =  !  (FC%"'!((  A5;*A9B 7= A6 .3:5*99A 7=36 G5/ (  !   ( ;;*3;9 7= 56 .<22*B237=A: G 5/  ( D *(  !  D ( F  C%"'  !(( 2:9*;537=56=

:= 7!"!( F  >'  '  > "(!( '  '(1 >D*!!( (7( '(( (  !>( )"0""7 (('(( (F ("H(!'( !(( %= ("H(("(C!!!"1*(=<5 * '")E'7)))(() ("  <3 ) <93A . 5/    (C "1!(  % ( '" . -'0"2;865 <3>(5662/=

;=  "!!(   'K  '"  "(( 1(( .(= B2 = 5  ( 39$=< '"  !(() <5'(!0<93:/=

    89:38566; :8:  

  5 4   /#   #  

%

67 8 00 9  :        ; < 2,* $=

<= )(  4  $   F (7"  !'(   !! 2:9*;537=56F &&,  & * &     &-  &  *  &          .  /  7)   !   D  ("H( !'(     "( ?9!566;>D*!!( (7(=

5= ME !((D 0=

2= 7!  '(   DM ')( 7!  (  '"( H(   "  26 > ?  (7( '?  0 7" " .&@PQ@7D;;66A  /') !(?  ( '07!"!(C(=35 7" " 07" " <B > 566: . -/N  !"!   (  D   !(7 ( !E ')('(1( ( ! (N ( H(  "  0 7" " ' ) '(  ' ) "(D C  (  *(= A5  -=  '"( H( (  '?  '  ()D"!!!E ') )(H(>(F*)=  177?  " (G     % R 4  

'7! '"(H(((7"C'(DMFM777" " '177

    89:38566;