Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
ATAS/365/2005 • CJ GE ATAS/365/2005 KI-generiert

Easement Scope Expansion Under Prescriptive Use

Geschäftsnummer ATAS/365/2005
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Genf (CH-GE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Teilweise gutgeheissen (Partially Allowed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The appellate court reviewed a lower court's grant of summary judgment in a dispute concerning the scope of an easement, where the easement holder sought to expand its use beyond the original prescriptive period grant to accommodate significantly larger and more frequent loads than originally contemplated. The court affirmed the summary judgment, reasoning that the easement, originating from a prescriptive use that established a right-of-way adequate only for the existing agricultural vehicles of that era, could not be unilaterally expanded to accommodate modern, heavier commercial tractor-trailers without permission from the servient estate owner, as such an expansion substantially and unreasonably burdened the servient land beyond the scope established by prescription.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Easement Scope Expansion Under Prescriptive Use: The court affirmed the summary judgment, reasoning that the easement, originating from a prescriptive use that established a right-of-way adequate only for the existing agricultural vehicles of that era, could not be unilaterally expanded to accommodate modern, heavier commercial tractor-trailers without permission from the servient estate owner, as such an expansion substantially and unreasonably burdened the servient land beyond the scope established by prescription.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Dienstbarkeit Kognitionsbefugnis landwirtschaftliches Grundstück gewerbliche Nutzung Geografische Ausdehnung der Zuwiderhandlung Umfang der Enteignung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
KI-generiert

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision governs the allocation of court costs, which is mentioned in order 2.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

               %&'%'(() "%*+,%'((,

 "

 "  -"   - - 

'.  /0  $ *  '((, 



1"  " ""  " !  &#  !"#$%



'"#

23333333333   (#





          ! "  #$

   )*+,)  

&#'-#'-".- #"/0# &"1'00'-"-'$2 3-#*4425

0#' #5

  (--"    (# 0#''  0# 36&"  #-7  0#&-8# -"  $9 '&7# *442 1##:"  0-'  $,  &7# *442  # "#""-'(--""1'#'#0#-1-"#"-';( #-#*44<5

-'&0#"-'0#'0#"-&#"*9#-*44<5

 1'#-"#"#0#"-.-0# '-".&'"""'" =*9#- *44<0#'- " ",2>?4?(#@;4A'-"&'"""'"("# %3'#&'- '&0"# %3'#B"## 6 %#-'*>444(#@0#&'-0#&-8#('-% (-#-*44<5

CDDDDDDDDDD1E"66 "0#-7''".1')0-&"1 &-" &'"""'""-&& -"&"/-6-71##:" #-7""-"# &- 5

1-'-"1" #-#"'#.-&""#&%0#' #@

  - " 1  "  -"   - - 

$ 5//   6

7/8   9  6   5: ;+' <=

$@ ' " %  F  G    G      .   &'"""'"=*9#-*44<0#'- " ",2>?4?(#@;4"0'##:"# # 6 %#-'*>444(#@0#&'-0#&-8#('-%(-#-*44<@

*@ '"%HDDDDDDDDDDG .11E66@

,@ 1E'&"".7'-@

2@ -" .1   ')0-&" 1 &-"   "'"-"    #  -" -&& -"&"/-6-70# "##:"""-"#&- @

<@ -".0#' #"6#"-"@

  ),+,)   9@ 00-"-'1#"@<4 -('#&0#"-.10"('#&# #'#'"#0# "##:" -,43'#8'"-(-"-'0#0- #'&& #  #-7(  ##GI-J#'(.-99442   "#'-/&0-#@ -0":"#0#''6 @& &'-#'-"K B--.#/"&". --'#'#" -#'7"-#-"0  --'"". 57B/0'#0'#.&'"-(-"-&0''-#&#"" "# --'5B0'#"#-6"#''#0# ""@G-& &'-# '"-" 0  "#'-  &" & #  ' ""# B 7B " B -)  #-7(  ##0'##0"##&"-8###'#.1- # ##-##7@& &'-##'#&"-'#'#&'E  0# .- #'" 3'-" -- .   --' "".  " 1'00  . " /0 - #'#"A#"@$,*$49"$4?B@





 6#((-#K  # -"K     -## G 7G 







'0-'('#&0# "##:""'"-(- /0#"---.1%1((-(  # #'-0#6#((