Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
ATAS/348/2005 • CJ GE ATAS/348/2005 KI-generiert

Contractual Breach Affirmation

Geschäftsnummer ATAS/348/2005
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Genf (CH-GE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The appellate court reviewed a decision regarding a dispute over contractual obligations where one party alleged breach due to the other's non-performance based on specific terms and corresponding deadlines. The court reasoned that the contract unambiguously established the performance requirements and that the evidence demonstrated a material failure to meet those stipulated terms, thereby affirming the initial finding of liability for the breach because the non-performing party failed to satisfy its clearly defined duties under the agreement.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Contractual Breach Affirmation: The court reasoned that the contract unambiguously established the performance requirements and that the evidence demonstrated a material failure to meet those stipulated terms, thereby affirming the initial finding of liability for the breach because the non-performing party failed to satisfy its clearly defined duties under the agreement.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Verletzung vertraglicher Pflichten Bejahung der Zuständigkeit Vertragsqualifikation Auslegung von Urteilen Gültigkeit der Schiedsvereinbarung Vertragspartei

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision governs the allocation of court costs, which was ordered in the dispositive.
KI-generiert
C/13731/2004
Contractual Breach Affirmation
C/17900/2003
Contractual Obligation Interpretation and Breach Affirmation
A/1254/2002
Contractual Breach and Damages Affirmation
A/736/2002
Contract Breach Interpretation and Liability Affirmation
A/1553/2006
Contractual Dispute Interpretation and Breach Affirmation

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision governs the allocation of court costs, which was ordered in the dispositive.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

               "#$%"&%%' "($)"&%%'



+ *+   +*   

,-  . /  &' 0 &%%' 



   1111111111 



2 !" # " $%"    !* &'()

                 !

   #/+'#  



1 "*  "/'2!3/..-"45 !" # " 6 #27 8 9 % :22   1  2 (! ;<<<<<<<<<<  !!"! " 2= 2  > .- /./,?@ A ": ! " 1B &&-B#  1B&..B#"1  1C2  2 *D)E%": !" 3 D " F

:*1""*  F

"&,!/..0":* G*"%  3"  C:""*  2* *  *H1 ! " "*  )*"8 "/'2!3/..-B$ %) 2"*  )*"8 "/'2!3/..-IF

*2"8 "&/% /..0C: %3  *"F

"  "  J :B 0/ 2! 7 28 "    1*"*   2  D**"" " "?3/...6 92*% J "*  2%KJ*"'.G2% ":22  27" :J "F

"*    D *11":% **J*2%  ":22  F

  :B 0' B &  /    "*     "*    22   1!! 2*  1  !  C *%     :*  : "*% 3*J!! " 1  %) !2  % " %) != " 2% J   2%  K 2"  2%B  : 2 %    "*     "*    22   1!! 2*  1 J:  ! 1! *  J   1   %K  !23B

::27: %J1 %2 3"! "*    D F

*J"** %3F



+,-.+/..0  #'+'#  

*  3  *+   +*   



45676   8  966 6  :! ;,& <

&B * %3F

/B 1!  2  "  J: 2% 1!    2* K "  "*  " '. G "7   1   2 2  !!"* "*   3 1*"* "  58L M81J  ? ?..-       )!2 B  "*   2 K 2D*B  !*!  " N 9 " J )!J"*  "* 3  2""*   J*F 39 )2 2 J ! 1   ! 2%  "!"   "*  F 9 2   D   "  2*B 5   !*!     2    **! *!**   9 39  9  #"   31*"*"22! 7J:  "%"* %3B!*! "! != " 2% J   G     J  "*   J*  :%22 " J**)2*" *6B&'/&.?&.@9B  D11 7N  * "N   =5 * (   

2 1!"2*K 1 *)2   J:C:11 1*"* "*23 J2D11



+,-.+/..0