Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
ATAS/319/2005 • CJ GE ATAS/319/2005 KI-generiert

Statutory Interpretation of Directory vs. Mandatory Procedural Requirements in Judgment Enforcement

Geschäftsnummer ATAS/319/2005
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Genf (CH-GE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case concerns a dispute over the proper scope of a statutory provision regarding the enforcement of judgments, specifically challenging whether a certain procedural step was validly taken. The court reasoned that the procedural requirement at issue was directory rather than mandatory, as a strict interpretation would lead to an unduly harsh result and the underlying purpose of the statute was satisfied by the action taken, thus upholding the validity of the enforcement procedure despite the technical deviation.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Statutory Interpretation of Directory vs. Mandatory Procedural Requirements in Judgment Enforcement: The court reasoned that the procedural requirement at issue was directory rather than mandatory, as a strict interpretation would lead to an unduly harsh result and the underlying purpose of the statute was satisfied by the action taken, thus upholding the validity of the enforcement procedure despite the technical deviation.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
verfahrensrechtliche Erläuterung Prozessvoraussetzung Vollstreckung Umfang der Amtspflicht Enge Auslegung und Anwendung Feststellungsklage

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Costs were imposed on the appellant.
KI-generiert
A/781/2005
Statutory Interpretation Regarding Formal Validity and Enforcement of Legal Instruments
A/1808/2002
Statutory Interpretation and Procedural Compliance in Transaction Classification
A/724/2007
Statutory Interpretation and Procedural Compliance in Contract and Property Disputes
A/1138/2005
Statutory Interpretation and Administrative Regulation Compliance
A/1850/2006
Statutory Interpretation and Procedural Compliance in Commercial Appeals

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Costs were imposed on the appellant.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

               $%$&''(  $)*%$&''(



+  ,+ ! -  +! -! 

&.  /0   *% 1 &''( 



  2222222222  $

 !"#$#%&&&&&&&&&&' ()



$ 

34!  5 !   -3 - 6  $0#  3 -     -   " '$*+,-./

            ! "#

   *215*  

"# #6 $""00!7# 8 $942 '"2:$7 2335 $"# 66$": "#07 233;<

  "5:"#07 233;$ #6": (#/  2334<

6." <

""06 $6 "6 $$"8=>$",0 $:2 / 2334< $$"=8-8"$$" . ""# #=8/"= /$#$#"$6 ?9&&&&&&&&&&$"00$#0"807"  $$"@6$( -8"",0 23346 ?0 &&&&&&&&&&$$$=$$" . /$6 -$060  "#=$=8#!!! /6/$>$  $" $=8 $ $ $ 67$#< / $ $  "/$7A$9

 ! - 3   ,+ ! -  +! -! 



7/8   9  :   ;# *<& -=>

:9 $-"=8 -8$7# 8 $942 '- 8$  " ?"0 &&&&&&&&&&  $$ =8  ! "  #$# %&&&&&&&&&&' 9

29 #="# 66$": "#07 233;9

59 $$=  $"/7A$9

;9 $=6 #" $! $$9

49 66$"8 $943 ( 06 $"=86/$( 0   $ 6 #$ >$""#"53A ".$($6 6 00"#" # 7(#"# " 'BCD B(=EE33;   $ @06 9"#6$>$ 6 !#90#0 "$F )"= @$0$="#  $"# 7$ $6" "#$$=#<7)@6 6 =0$($06/ "0" $$



1+12334  *515*   $ "#<)6 $ !$ " 6 #$$9'0#0  $$ 6  $  ##0$ #0# #  $$  ) 7) $ ) *"  7(#"# " 6 6$  0$.    =8 "/ "#   /790#0 "  0$  0G " 6 / =  $ A$  =  "# $$=# $ 8/66 " =#$#@6#"#  $ $9:52:3E$:3,)9





    ! (( F  #"$F     77       

6( 0"6 #$ >$$$(#@6 $=8-8(((#"#  " 6 ! ((





1+12334