Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
ATAS/312/2004 • CJ GE ATAS/312/2004 KI-generiert

Appellant v. Respondent on Contractual Ambiguity and Extrinsic Evidence in Royalty Calculation

Geschäftsnummer ATAS/312/2004
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Genf (CH-GE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The appellant challenged a lower court's ruling regarding the construction of a document, asserting that the trial court improperly relied on extrinsic evidence to interpret an unambiguous contractual provision, specifically concerning the calculation of a royalty payment based on a contract term that referenced a prior agreement's structure. The appellate court reasoned that while the contract's language suggested a clear intent regarding the application of the referenced agreement, the trial court correctly admitted the extrinsic evidence because the term was ambiguous when read in the context of the entire agreement and the parties' course of performance, ultimately affirming the lower court's determination that the royalty calculation method was properly ascertained through the consideration of surrounding circumstances and historical conduct.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Appellant v. Respondent on Contractual Ambiguity and Extrinsic Evidence in Royalty Calculation: The appellate court reasoned that while the contract's language suggested a clear intent regarding the application of the referenced agreement, the trial court correctly admitted the extrinsic evidence because the term was ambiguous when read in the context of the entire agreement and the parties' course of performance, ultimately affirming the lower court's determination that the royalty calculation method was properly ascertained through the consideration of surrounding circumstances and historical conduct.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
vertragliche Vergütung Auslegung von Urteilen Art der Zuwiderhandlung Streitgegenstand Verwirkung im Handelsrecht Warenpapier

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The court orders the losing party to pay the costs of the federal court.
KI-generiert
A/164/2006
Contract Ambiguity and Parol Evidence Admission
A/1772/2004
Royalty Calculation Dispute and Contract Interpretation
A/2751/2006
Contract Ambiguity and Admissibility of Extrinsic Evidence
A/2332/2003
Contract Interpretation and Extrinsic Evidence
A/2202/2004
Contract Interpretation and Summary Judgment Affirmance

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court orders the losing party to pay the costs of the federal court.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

               "#$#"%$$& "'(%"%$$&

))

* )*   *)   

+,  - . &  %$$& 



/ 0000000000 ! " #$ % &    ! '(!))*$($!)$$



! 

  1   ! $!$( ) #+,-./



                 !

   43054  

 2

67  5 322- $!8/$)!$9  : ) )($$! %!;"$ <<<<<<<<<< !)' &) = 752>74).6 $32257

37  ,   322- "7 <<<<<<<<<<     $? ! )   $;'! )!!) $. )($$7

57 3@/ $322-  $)( (  $! A!($!$ )"7<<<<<<<<<<! ))($$ A!!7



 )

67 B! )' !7,3736. # )$=()(   !$8(( ) ) $!) $)@!? 32229 :)($$/!+!  !!*( )  52 A    /$ )'$!$  . ) '   *$   )7

)($$ $!$!A!!;   .) $?!)  $9 !7,@!,1 :7 $?)(!(!!  B$ )($$ $!$ )$!$)$=()(   ' 4/$$ !  /$/! ) 32 )(?  6C-@ 9 &: 9 !7 ,@ 7 6 !!7#76:7

37  '.    )$! +!  )( ( $ /? ).   *'$  (!( $! A!( ! )($$)5 322-!! $!(   $!$7



  01210322-  45054  



)  2  )*   *)   

3/4/   5  6// /  7! (+% 

67 (   $ /?D

37 =    !$ )  *' /! =     !    (!  +! )  )($ ) 52 A  ).  !$=$!$   $ )( ) (  $? =()(  )   &#E$F #=*$ @ @22-     ! $ B$ 7  )($  ! +!   8(7  ($  )$!G : $)$*  B!!*)($$  !)($ ?!$ $!))($$ !!*(D ?: B    * !$= $ !$ /$  ))  !! !  )($$D :  !   $8!    )   (!!7 &$  ($   !$!   ! $ ((! (( (  !!  : ?: ! : $4)  $?=()( )  !  !$.    *'$ )/ )(  $ /?7($ )  !$  % )  / *$  ! A$! $$ *  )($$ !!*( ! '/ ) *(!(B()$(  !9 !765362@!62>:7  8 ==$. G   ($)!G   %& ( $"   $= ) (! +!!!$=$(B !$$$*';'==$=()(  ) $ 8 ==

  01210322-