Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
ATAS/1060/2008 • CJ GE ATAS/1060/2008 KI-generiert

Appeal Regarding Implied Rejection in Municipal Administrative Procedure

Geschäftsnummer ATAS/1060/2008
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Genf (CH-GE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The appeal concerned a decision related to a municipal administrative procedure where the appellant challenged the rejection of their request for authorization, arguing that the authority had failed to provide a timely decision as required by law. The court upheld the decision, reasoning that since the administrative authority had not formally issued a decision within the statutory period, the resulting administrative silence amounted to a rejection, and the appeal challenging the silence was therefore properly directed against that implied rejection.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 93 al. 1 let. a LTF, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Appeal Regarding Implied Rejection in Municipal Administrative Procedure: The court upheld the decision, reasoning that since the administrative authority had not formally issued a decision within the statutory period, the resulting administrative silence amounted to a rejection, and the appeal challenging the silence was therefore properly directed against that implied rejection.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Gemeindebehörden verwaltungsrechtlicher Widerruf Verfahrensrügen anfechtbarer Zwischenentscheid Verwaltungsbeschwerde der Bediensteten Subrogation des Gemeinwesens

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 93 al. 1 let. a LTF
Used to declare the appeal inadmissible because the decision constituted an appealable final decision.
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Provision cited for the allocation of court costs.
KI-generiert
C/12605/2018
Administrative Silence and Mootness of Appeal Period
A/3962/2013
Appeal Against Administrative Law Decision Upheld
A/243/2017
Appealability of Incidental Administrative Order Compelling Permit Application
A/984/2024
Applicant's Appeal of Administrative Clarification of Prior Court Order Dismissed
A/2563/2009
Applicants' Request for Interpretation of Administrative Ruling Rejected

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 93 al. 1 let. a LTF

Used to declare the appeal inadmissible because the decision constituted an appealable final decision.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Provision cited for the allocation of court costs.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

A/560/2008

### [ATAS/1060/2008](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1962024) du 25.09.2008 ( PC ) , ADMIS

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2008/0010/ATAS_001060_2008_A_560_2008.pdf)

* /