Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
ATAS/1022/2020 • CJ GE ATAS/1022/2020 KI-generiert

Appeal Withdrawal in Complementary Benefits Recalculation Case

Geschäftsnummer ATAS/1022/2020
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Genf (CH-GE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A litigant appealed a decision from the complementary benefits service that recalculated their entitlement to benefits for the period from May 1, 2018, to February 29, 2020; however, the court noted that the appeal was withdrawn by the appellant via a letter dated October 14, 2020, leading the Social Insurance Chamber to formally acknowledge the withdrawal and strike the case from the court roll.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Appeal Withdrawal in Complementary Benefits Recalculation Case: A litigant appealed a decision from the complementary benefits service that recalculated their entitlement to benefits for the period from May 1, 2018, to February 29, 2020; however, the court noted that the appeal was withdrawn by the appellant via a letter dated October 14, 2020, leading the Social Insurance Chamber to formally acknowledge the withdrawal and strike the case from the court roll.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Entzug von Sozialversicherungsleistungen Anspruch auf Versicherungsleistungen Neuberechnung der Ergänzungsleistungen Komplementärrente Wiedererwägung durch den Versicherer Wiederaufleben von Invalidenleistungen

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This article is cited implicitly as the court order relates to the costs following the withdrawal of the appeal, although the final disposition does not explicitly contain a cost order provision, the procedure implies that costs rules are applicable or are governed by standard procedural rules when an action is withdrawn.
KI-generiert
A/1079/2023
Appeal Withdrawal in Complementary Benefits Case
A/1500/2018
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Complementary Benefits
A/1453/2024
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Recalculated Complementary Benefits After Transitional Regime Expiration
A/914/2021
Appeal Withdrawal and Case Dismissal
A/1166/2017
Withdrawal of Appeal After Recalculation of Benefits

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This article is cited implicitly as the court order relates to the costs following the withdrawal of the appeal, although the final disposition does not explicitly contain a cost order provision, the procedure implies that costs rules are applicable or are governed by standard procedural rules when an action is withdrawn.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

A/854/2020

### [ATAS/1022/2020](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/2554799) du 29.10.2020 ( PC ) , RETIRE

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file//2020/0010/ATAS_001022_2020_A_854_2020.pdf)

rÉpublique et · canton de genÈve

POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE

A/854/2020 ATAS/1022/2020 COUR DE JUSTICE Chambre des assurances sociales

Arrêt du 29 octobre 2020 3ème Chambre

En la cause

Madame A______, domiciliée à GENÈVE, comparant avec élection de domicile en l'étude de Maître Monique STOLLER FÜLLEMANN · recourante

contre

SERVICE DES PRESTATIONS COMPLÉMENTAIRES, DCS - SPC, sis route de Chêne 54, GENÈVE · intimé

Vu la décision sur oppositions du 6 février 2020 du Service des prestations complémentaires (ci-après : SPC) recalculant le droit aux prestations de Madame A______ pour la période du 1er mai 2018 au 29 février 2020 ;

Vu le recours interjeté par l'intéressée le 31 mars 2020 ;

Vu la réponse de l'intimé du 9 avril 2020 ;

Attendu que, par courrier du 14 octobre 2020, le recours a été retiré ;

Qu'il convient d'en prendre acte et de rayer la cause du rôle.

PAR CES MOTIFS,

LA CHAMBRE DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES :

1. Prend acte du retrait du recours.

2. Raye la cause du rôle.

La greffière Marie-Catherine SÉCHAUD · La Présidente Karine STECK

Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties par le greffe le