Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
ATAS/1021/2004 • CJ GE ATAS/1021/2004 KI-generiert

Offer Revocation Preceding Settlement Acceptance Validity

Geschäftsnummer ATAS/1021/2004
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Genf (CH-GE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Teilweise gutgeheissen (Partially Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case addresses whether a claimant who accepted a settlement offer prior to the expiration of a formal procedural deadline, but after the opposing party had communicated an intention to withdraw that offer, is entitled to the payment under the terms of the settlement. The court reasoned that because the acceptance was communicated after the offeror had clearly manifested an intent to revoke, the offer was legally terminated before acceptance, rendering the purported acceptance ineffective and preventing the formation of a binding contract based on the settlement proposal.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Offer Revocation Preceding Settlement Acceptance Validity: The court reasoned that because the acceptance was communicated after the offeror had clearly manifested an intent to revoke, the offer was legally terminated before acceptance, rendering the purported acceptance ineffective and preventing the formation of a binding contract based on the settlement proposal.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Annahme des Antrags Kündigung eines Vertrags Zahlungsfrist Widerruf der Niederlassungsbewilligung Prozesserledigung longa manu traditio

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF
Used to reject the appeal as inadmissible, which is the main order.
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Imposed costs for the federal proceedings.
KI-generiert
A/3243/2007
Validity of Settlement Agreement Enforcement
A/760/2005
Enforceability of Settlement Agreement
A/1482/2001
Settlement Validity and Breach Dispute in Prior Litigation
A/81/2004
Settlement Agreement Validity Upheld
A/4479/2006
Settlement Agreement Validity Challenged Due to Duress and Lack of Consideration Upheld

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF

Used to reject the appeal as inadmissible, which is the main order.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Imposed costs for the federal proceedings.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

               #$%&#%''( #)'%)#%''(



 *+ + +  *+  

(,  -.   / -  %''( 



   0000000000 



11 + +  2   ! "#$ $$#" %$&%&$'()'

       

         !"

   &,*0&  

+ 1

12 %"$$%-.!#3,..-455$" $%!#6$&!)7 !" 8 4 % 9%# ::::::::::  !$ % %$ 8 4$%#$"%;<# !%"%$=>2 %"$$"$#$'" !  5$ = 4"  4"$ ! !"" 8 4$ % <  ,, !#3##!"'#$#,+!#3,..-2

,2 4$""5#""#$,,%"#3,..-5$'$=4"$ ?%#%$>=48;#-.'#3,..-2

-2  %"$$ % ,+ # ,../ 455$  % 4#!$ 6$&!) 4 7  %"" "#$$'3!%%$'" #$'=" >$5$!$$%%"$2

/2 %"#$@ 55% $3%"/#$,../4" $>"2 ) =4"$$?%#%$$ %#!$$2 5$'$=4"$!33"!"%" 4!$'#$%4!%"=4%'$!" !!5$!!$$2 !!"=44'$##$ #=#;#$$&$%A8%$$%"!%%'"2

02 "!%-!#3,../4 >%' =4"'$!$3$$"%5$!"!!2

(2 %  %$ % #!$ ! !  $3 % "  1 %"#3,../4"%""=4'$#$!""$%4 =4"$'$=4%'$!"!!5$ !!$$2  4 =4 %"#3 ,..- =4 '$ !!$ =4 $ ! ; $%5$2

B2 "" %"8> 2





+ * 

12 $ '$4 $$>%$$$67""#%$5$"$$"%) 1A,..- $3%$#!"%0>  %  !"$%   '$&!"$% 0 !!"  1( >   62 1 20( 72



*+,-*,../  &-*0&   C$84$%4"$%1(> ! $35"%" ,B>'$,../6 D1-.1.(7% $ '$%!"1-5"'$  %$!$$$$ !# $3% $ % $"    8 $ >  $$  % 4 % 4"$%'E> 2

,2  $3  %  $ F  $ $= % $ $' 8  $ 5"%"  4 ;<#  3$ $  4$%#$"%4$'3$$"& 60(72

C#!"!> %%4!)$$"3$2

-2 $5"%"!$ ""%%$%$%(3 ,...6 7 "  '$  1 >'$ ,..- F  #%$5$$ % #3 %$!$$ "  %  %#$ %  $2 C %$!$$4!!$=8 5%" $E!62121 72

5#"#E20(21(.21 %"$$!!$$ !$3 %  %  %"$ % -. > $'  $5$$ %  %"$$>82 #!%5$=%"$ ! %B)# >'G=B)#>!)G=$$'#=G="$ %$1,'$,../@/#$,../%"$$!!$$ $5$",+#,../'32

/2 C4$0,21 %"$$!'?="% >!'$%4!!$$!)%4=$%84E!$% %"$$%4%#%!"%2421.%4%!$ ""%%$%$%11!#3,..,6 7" '$ 1>'$,..-!"$=4!!$$%$$%$ ?#$'"2 %$?5#"!$$!!"$%H! ? 5#" # 4% !"'$ = 4 $  4!!$$ %!)&'3$ "!4!!!"" 2

 4!)  %"$$ % -. !#3 ,..- #$$ $# = 4!!$$%'$?5#"!"$!)% !"#$%455$  % 4#!$ %  %"$ % -. >2     5#" !!$$  ,, %"#3 ,..- # $ ! % %E #$ !)  %"$$2

 $3 % " !! =4 %"$ "   ! ? ! " 6$ /. 21 !!$3! $'%4$(.2, 72 55  "$" % %$ E$  = $  I $#   I  !$!?#!$!"$!%#!J#$$#$ E !$3$$" % $ %  #$) =  !$ ; ' $%=4=$43>%!"%%"5$$$'#"5



*+,-*,../  &/*0&   6$9$%#$$$5'1++1!21K172$$% %"$ ! !% ? %" % #$) E!$ 8 %$$ =  #%$$""#!?;"5%4 $%%"$5$E"  !  =4 %#% % $$ #$'" $%$=   % 4#!?;# $ "" !"" %  %$E > 8 #! % $ H 4#!?;#"6$/121 72F4#$%$'$ ""E""%#?#%"$24 $&8%%$!$$$#!"$'E= $  ! ? %" " 6$!% % $" %#$$$' %  5"%"$L M(.*1++($%202/!2-(BN D11+KB$%2,N D 11,,0($%2,72 !$%%5#>= "'"# E%$$  $#!"'$$3 '  %; %  !;) %4$'$" % 4$""  4$#! 8 $ % 5@ $"$$3 6 2 O  ;P$Q$;3$ $;+)#"%2,...!2,,+72

 4!)   F &#?# '$ #   %"$$ % -. !#3 ,..-    =4 "$ !%" %'$  !" !#!5$!!$$24"$$%"$$"$E!$$ !$2

  # $'=" !    $ >$5$  $$ % %"$%42/12 2









RRR











*+,-*,../  &0*0&   *  1  *+ + +  *+  

 -343   5  633 3  2" )7%  

  43 

12 @$N

 43

,2 >N

-2 $=!"% $N

/2 5#  !$ %  =4 !' 5#    !" ? %  %"$ % -. > %)  $5$$ ! !$ ##%" %"  $3 5"%" %  C;P$Q;5=$ ( (../     $ E#!$2  %"$  ! ? ! "2  #"#$ %$J 7 $%$= E#=%"$$%"$3$$!%%"$$ ="N 37 E! ! = #$5 $ $# !'$ %#%   %"$$N 7 !  $    %  !"2 C$  #"#$  $ !  $ ""# "#""   7 37  7 $&%  $35"%"%!!#$)=4$ %'%"$'32#"#$%#$#S % !' =$  >$ $$ =  %"$$ ="  4'!! % =""E!"%$"621-,1.(1.K72   55$J  "$%J   T$%  9  $               

 !$5#% !" ?$5$"E!$C"$%4 8 4"#$! 55



*+,-*,../