Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
A/4667/2005 • TAPI GE A/4667/2005 KI-generiert

Appeal Regarding Timeliness of Opposition and Admissibility of Evidence

Geschäftsnummer A/4667/2005
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Genf (CH-GE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The appellant contested a decision, arguing that the opposition filed by the opposing party was time-barred under Article 23, paragraph 2 of the relevant procedural law, and that the trial court erred by not admitting evidence to prove the late filing, despite this constituting a direct means of proof regarding the timeliness of the action. The court rejected the appeal, implicitly finding that the opposition was timely or that the procedural requirements concerning the admissibility of evidence related to time limits were correctly applied by the lower court, thereby affirming the original decision.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Appeal Regarding Timeliness of Opposition and Admissibility of Evidence: The court rejected the appeal, implicitly finding that the opposition was timely or that the procedural requirements concerning the admissibility of evidence related to time limits were correctly applied by the lower court, thereby affirming the original decision.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Rechtzeitigkeit der Rechtsschrift verspätete Einwendungen Anfechtbarkeit des Rückweisungsentscheids Zeitpunkt der Beweisübermittlung neues rechtliches Vorbringen Anspruch auf einen Entscheid
KI-generiert
A/1755/2007
Appellant v. Opponent on Timeliness and Standing of Opposition
C/4030/2013
Appellant v. Respondent on Timeliness of Claim and Evidentiary Rulings
C/20181/2019
Appeal Regarding Timeliness of Seizure Opposition
P/16143/2024
Appeal Regarding Timeliness of Opposition to Penal Order Service
P/5370/2024
Appeal Regarding Admissibility of Timely Opposition Despite Postal Error

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

A/4667/2005

### [DCRI/27/2008](/apps/decis/fr/dccr/show/1602232) du 28.01.2008 ( ICC ) , REJETE

Descripteurs :

; DÉLAI ; OPPOSITION(PROCÉDURE) ; MOYEN DE DROIT ; ADMINISTRATION DES PREUVES

Normes :

LISP. 23. al2

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/dccr/file/2008/0000/DCRI_000027_2008_A_4667_2005.pdf)

* /