Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
A/4198/2005 • TAPI GE A/4198/2005 KI-generiert

Appeal Regarding Deductibility of Professional Expenses

Geschäftsnummer A/4198/2005
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Genf (CH-GE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case concerns an appeal regarding the deductibility of professional expenses, where the appellant sought to claim deductions under a specific tax law provision. The court rejected the appeal, reasoning that the claimed expenses did not meet the strict criteria or the necessary substantiation required for deduction under the relevant article of the law, thereby upholding the prior decision.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

LIPP-V.3.al2; Appeal Regarding Deductibility of Professional Expenses: The court rejected the appeal, reasoning that the claimed expenses did not meet the strict criteria or the necessary substantiation required for deduction under the relevant article of the law, thereby upholding the prior decision.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Abzug von Berufskosten Steuerliche Vorschriften / Steuerrecht Beschwerdelegitimation Rechtsberuf Anwaltskosten Übernommene Krankheitskosten ; FRAIS PROFESSIONNELS | LIPP-V.3.al2

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
LIPP-V.3.al2
This provision is cited in the normative section preceding the dispositive, indicating its relevance to the final decision.
KI-generiert
A/1994/2003
Tax Deduction Appeal on Professional Expenses
A/4349/2005
Medical Expense Deductibility Appeal
A/2724/2021
Tax Assessment Appeal: Deductible Professional Expenses and Interest Calculation
A/1440/2006
Deductibility of Professional Expenses in Ancillary Activities
A/802/1997
Deductibility of Preliminary Business Expenses and Commercial Loss

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
LIPP-V.3.al2

This provision is cited in the normative section preceding the dispositive, indicating its relevance to the final decision.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

A/4198/2005

### [DCRI/6/2008](/apps/decis/fr/dccr/show/1602213) du 28.01.2008 ( ICC ) , REJETE

Descripteurs :

; FRAIS PROFESSIONNELS

Normes :

LIPP-V.3.al2

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/dccr/file/2008/0000/DCRI_000006_2008_A_4198_2005.pdf)

* /