Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
A/1529/2005 • TAPI GE A/1529/2005 KI-generiert

Succession Property Partition Appeal: Deviation from Initial Claims Barred

Geschäftsnummer A/1529/2005
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Genf (CH-GE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case concerns an appeal regarding a partition of succession property, where the appellant challenged the lower court's decision by submitting conclusions that deviated from those initially presented, specifically concerning the division of assets and the allocation of specific shares. The court rejected the appeal, holding that according to procedural law provisions governing successions, a party cannot introduce new conclusions or claims on appeal that were not previously submitted to the initial court, emphasizing that the appeal is limited to examining the grounds raised in the original proceedings unless otherwise permitted by law.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

LDS.67.1, LPA.65; Succession Property Partition Appeal: Deviation from Initial Claims Barred: The court rejected the appeal, holding that according to procedural law provisions governing successions, a party cannot introduce new conclusions or claims on appeal that were not previously submitted to the initial court, emphasizing that the appeal is limited to examining the grounds raised in the original proceedings unless otherwise permitted by law.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Erbrecht Beschwerdelegitimation Sondergut Vermögen Teilklage Praxisänderung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
LDS.67.1
The appeal was dismissed because the conclusion was not sufficiently motivated according to this provision.
LPA.65
The appeal was declared inadmissible because the conclusion lacked the required support or lacked a clear request.
KI-generiert

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
LDS.67.1

The appeal was dismissed because the conclusion was not sufficiently motivated according to this provision.

LPA.65

The appeal was declared inadmissible because the conclusion lacked the required support or lacked a clear request.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

A/1529/2005

### [DCRI/170/2007](/apps/decis/fr/dccr/show/1602075) du 07.05.2007 ( ICC ) , REJETE

Descripteurs :

; DROIT DES SUCCESSIONS ; CONDITION DE RECEVABILITÉ ; CONCLUSIONS

Normes :

LPA.65; LDS.67.1; LDS.14

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/dccr/file/2007/0001/DCRI_000170_2007_A_1529_2005.pdf)

* /