# Încheierea nr. 4256/2013 — Motion to change venue dismissed for non-compliance with procedural requirements

**Geschäftsnummer:** Încheierea nr. 4256/2013
**Gericht / Behörde:** Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie — Secţia I civilă
**Entscheiddatum:** 2013-10-03
**Ausgang:** Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
**Canonical Legislator URL:** https://legislator.ch/de/case/ro/ICCJ_99935/incheierea-nr-4256-2013-motion-to-change-venue-dismissed-for-non-compliance-with-procedura
**Official Source URL:** https://www.scj.ro/1093/Detalii-jurisprudenta?customQuery%5B0%5D.Key=id&customQuery%5B0%5D.Value=99935

## Zusammenfassung (Sachverhalt & Erwägungen)

The High Court of Cassation and Justice rejected the motion filed by the petitioner to transfer the jurisdiction of Case No. 3479/333/2013 from the Vaslui District Court, with the Public Prosecutor recommending dismissal and the decision rendered without appeal. The dispute concerned a procedural request to relocate the trial venue, where the court noted that the case had a scheduled hearing date shortly after the filing and that written submissions had been provided by the opposing party. The court’s decision rested on the procedural requirements for changing the venue, finding no grounds to deviate from the designated court of first instance, thereby maintaining the original jurisdiction for the pending civil matter.

## Leitsatz / Regeste

The High Court of Cassation and Justice rejected the motion filed by the petitioner to transfer the jurisdiction of Case No. 3479/333/2013 from the Vaslui District Court, with the Public Prosecutor recommending dismissal and the decision rendered without appeal. The dispute concerned a procedural request to relocate the trial venue, where the court noted that the case had a scheduled hearing date shortly after the filing and that written submissions had been provided by the opposing party. The court’s decision rested on the procedural requirements for changing the venue, finding no grounds to deviate from the designated court of first instance, thereby maintaining the original jurisdiction for the pending civil matter.

## Volltext des Entscheids

Magistratul asistent face referatul cauzei și arată că, potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor, dosarul a cărui strămutare se solicită are termen de judecată la 9 octombrie 2013 și că intimata SC F. SRL a depus note scrise.

Petentul solicită admiterea cererii, conform motivelor formulate în scris și prezentate verbal.

Reprezentanta Ministerului Public pune concluzii de respingere a cererii de strămutare.

Analizând cererea,

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Respinge cererea formulată de petentul G.L. privind strămutarea pricinii care face obiectul Dosarului nr. 3479/333/2013 al Judecătoriei Vaslui.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 3 octombrie 2013.
