# Încheierea nr. 4222/2013 — Transfer of appellate civil case between courts of appeal

**Geschäftsnummer:** Încheierea nr. 4222/2013
**Gericht / Behörde:** Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie — Secţia I civilă
**Entscheiddatum:** 2013-10-02
**Ausgang:** Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
**Canonical Legislator URL:** https://docs.legislator.ch/de/sources/court-decision/eu-ro/ICCJ_99925/transfer-of-appellate-civil-case-between-courts-of-appeal
**Official Source URL:** https://www.scj.ro/1093/Detalii-jurisprudenta?customQuery%5B0%5D.Key=id&customQuery%5B0%5D.Value=99925

## Zusammenfassung (Sachverhalt & Erwägungen)

The High Court of Cassation and Justice granted the applicant's motion to transfer venue, ordering the case to move from the Court of Appeal of Brașov to the Court of Appeal of Pitești, while maintaining the procedural acts already executed by the original court; the prosecutor opposed the transfer, which is final without appeal. The dispute involved a procedural request to relocate a specific civil case pending before the Brașov appellate court, with the applicant asserting the necessity of a transfer based on legal grounds, while the court verified the case was properly stamped and communicated. The decision relied on the statutory competence of the High Court to determine venue transfers between appellate courts and the procedural requirements for such motions, specifically confirming the existence and current status of the underlying file on the original court's docket.

## Leitsatz / Regeste

The High Court of Cassation and Justice granted the applicant's motion to transfer venue, ordering the case to move from the Court of Appeal of Brașov to the Court of Appeal of Pitești, while maintaining the procedural acts already executed by the original court; the prosecutor opposed the transfer, which is final without appeal. The dispute involved a procedural request to relocate a specific civil case pending before the Brașov appellate court, with the applicant asserting the necessity of a transfer based on legal grounds, while the court verified the case was properly stamped and communicated. The decision relied on the statutory competence of the High Court to determine venue transfers between appellate courts and the procedural requirements for such motions, specifically confirming the existence and current status of the underlying file on the original court's docket.

## Volltext des Entscheids

Se referă de magistratul asistent asupra faptului că cererea de strămutare este legal timbrată, comunicată intimatei. De asemenea, se referă că potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor Dosarul nr. 9841/62/2012 a cărui strămutare se solicită se află pe rolul Curții de Apel Brașov și are termen de judecată la data de 24 octombrie 2013.

Reprezentanta Ministerului Public pune concluzii de respingere a cererii de strămutare.

Analizând cererea,

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Admite cererea formulată de petenta P.D.P., prin care solicită strămutarea cauzei ce formează obiectul Dosarului nr. 9841/62/2012 al Curții de Apel Brașov.

Strămută judecarea cauzei de la Curtea de Apel Brașov, la Curtea de Apel Pitești.

Păstrează actele de procedură îndeplinite de instanță înainte de strămutare.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 2 octombrie 2013.